The attachment does not contain the described marking of the unwanted part. Therefore, I am attaching the attachment again and correctly.

Hello,
there is a minimum height for the page overall, so my suggestion would be to create a Simple Separator object above and/or below the few objects on the page to avoid the undesired space there.

(It > En) ... ... you have to do a little bit of your own, ... without the LINK of a real online example it cannot be evaluated...
1) ... with my EXTRA CSS code it would be possible to have the FOOTER always in view, positioned fixed at the bottom of the page of all pages, long or short...
2) ... or with my dynamic EXTRA JS code it would be possible to position the FOOTER at the bottom of the window only on short pages...

.

ciao

.

Now the error does not occur there. The point was that the page would scroll vertically further than the footer if the page was longer than the height of the screen. now it doesn't and I don't know why. I didn't change any global settings or the page where there were problems. Weird. If the problem occurs again, I will write here again.

Link to original problematic page (extra exported) I currently have about 50 more done that were not affected by the error.

http://www.speedspage.cz/TEST/kdo-byl-kdo-v-ut---v.html

No, thank you. I like my version much better. It did a different thing for me - I could roll all the way down to the heel. It's not happening now. So I made a bug in the graphics editor, which did it, but it doesn't anymore. I didn't change anything, but it disappeared.

As I dealt with this error, which suddenly disappeared again, I came across that the individual blocks were being ordered differently than I would like. The solution would be to put a photo description block to the right of the photo, but I would like the photo and the description below it. The advantage is that not many people will use a resolution below 480 pixels, so this problem should not arise. I wanted to delete the resolution below 400 pixels, but it is not possible - it is fixed in the program.

You can adjust the viewports. You cannot remove the last viewport, but you can adjust the viewports so that all viewports apart from the "widest" will only be active at very small resolutions.

You can set the order of the objects (by rerarranging the numbering) and you can set "breaks" for the objects.

I have a very very old example (Ver. 12)   https://www.calendarforum.dk/restaurant/about-the-staff.html where the text is set to follow the images. The last viewport should have been made "smaller" but the example was made to show the folding/unfolding of the text.

I think the best will be to use the built-in possibilities to style the objects. In the example there is no extra code used - apart of the code for folding/unfolding the text. 

Example to show how the order combined with a break can be used.

Here: https://bramminginfo.dk/arnbjergparken.html#Anker_Beplantningen

There is 2 images shown on one line and then the text beneath. It continues that way until the last viewport is reached. The images is then shown first and then the text beneath both images.

Try to scale the browser until the last viewport is reached.

If this is not what you meant with " I came across that the individual blocks were being ordered differently than I would like.", then just forget about my posts.