Confusion about page layout being called a table
Autore: John W.I have been researching your product with independent reviews. I have to be certain that I can make it work for what I need it to do. In one of the reviews, it stated that the page layout is done in a table. When I look at the source code for your web pages, I can see that your generator is your own product. That is good. Last software package I bought, the company did not use their own software to writie their own site. And they admitted it after I purchased. Thought that was pretty lame - showing off, but yet not showing off their own stuff.
Anyhow, I do not see any table notations in your html code. So I think the person who said your site creates pages in a table misunderstood. Your video shows a table type set up which obviously changes depending upon the selected template. And you can modify widths and heights of the usable cells. But the page layout is not a table per se. It is still fluid, which allows for the repsonsive layout to do its thing. If it were locked into a table, thus resizing the table would probably create an unfriendly user experience on small screens. This is what I deal with now with my current software and I must let it go.
So is that correct? The wording "table" and "cells" when laying out pages is only for a neat aligned page and really is not a table when the html is published?
Yes that is correct.
Why not try it with the demo version ?
http://www.websitex5.com/en/demo-professional.html
or
http://www.websitex5.com/en/demo-professional.html
You can even continue with your project if you choose to buy it from the demo.
Autore
Thank you Andre.
I am getting close to deciding. But a new hiccup. In the showcase of websites on this website, there is one: Linda Wedding Design. The generator tag says it was created with WebSite X5 Professional ver. 11. Yet when I looked at the site on a mobile device, it was not responsive.
So it makes me wonder, why? Any thoughts or explanations on that?
Responsive is not -yet- in x5, they (Incomedia) are looking in to possibilities for this, it's a complex issue, hopefully we will get an answer soon that its'possible. But at the moment no, it's not responsive.