Seo Review
Author: Raoul R.The Testimonial & Rating like used on https://www.clubtaxi.nl/taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html does not get crawled by Google bot. Each time I create a script that passes the test on https://validator.schema.org/ like the latest:
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Review",
"itemReviewed": {
"@type": "TaxiService",
"name": "Taxi Amsterdam Schiphol"
},
"reviewRating": {
"@type": "Rating",
"ratingValue": "9",
"bestRating": "10"
},
"review": {
"@type": "Review",
"datePublished": "2021-11-16",
"reviewBody": "Heen en terug met reis tussenstop was perfect geregeld. Clubtaxi ga ik zeker vaker gebruiken.",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Rudolf"
},
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Klanten Vertellen"
}
}
}
</script>
It gets rejected by Google as faulty. Reason as I understand the Item Reviewed is not a thing. Anybody a suggestion how to solve this matter, eying on the result that what is in the box Testimonials & Rating gets crawled. Thanks in advance
Author
Suggestion 1:
Author
Suggestion 2:
Author
allo allo?
Author
Why do I not get a reply/assistance?
Hello Raoul,
my apologies, I had misinterpreted your question as being about custom code, but are you instead having issues with the indexing for this object, is that correct?
Could you please provide additional details on what you noticed in the Search Console?
Eric
Author
Indeed, the item review can be indexed, but the bots seem to ignore objects that do not load instantly. For that reason I tried to solve that issue by adding a code, but I failed. And I do not think I can find a solution in writing a code, but I might be wrong. Reason I shared the code. I have spoken with a developer, and he gave me the input I shared with the picture uploads.
It is a pitty when reviews do not get indexed, no need to explain that.
Author
Sometimes it gets indexed, I found one at https://www.clubtaxi.nl/taxi-hillegom-schiphol.html
Google Mooie nieuwe taxi. Aardige en behulpzame chauffeur. Heen en terug goed op tijd.
So, perhaps overtime the matters solves it self, but there is space for improvement (understatement). Thanks for your attention, I am open for suggestions if you have any at this stage.
Hello Raoul,
was the taxi-hillegom-schiphol.html page published earlier than taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html, or were they both created in the same version of the website?
Eric
Author
Good Q Eric, I understand the background. It may be a matter of hours apart. In what order I do not recall. More telling perhaps; I requested via Search Console to index ''taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html'' frequently, and not hillegom. In Ubersuggest taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html ranks low, so I tried several changes followed by a new request. I did not request for a new index last week for that page, gave up so to speak, and made the post above.
But agreed, we can give it a week more and see what happens.
Author
This conversation got indexed, I mean google the review text and this thread is top result in google search, I think that says it all...
Hello Raoul,
do taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html and taxi-hillegom-schiphol.html have the same settings in Properties - Expert here?
Thank you.
Eric
Author
yes the same for both, priority level 5, every month. But as said I have requested Google to Index the amsterdam version several times this week. Via search console.
Hello,
I will take a closer look at those pages with the developer so what we can try to ascertain what could be causing the difference.
I can see there are several similar pages, depending on the taxi service offered, on your website, is the situation with most of them the same as
https://www.clubtaxi.nl/taxi-amsterdam-schiphol.html ?
And there are no warnings of some kind on the search console, is that correct?
Eric
Author
Yes, and if I placed a review on a page the review gets most of the time not indexed, or much later than other changes. That is why I think bots index content that appears in full in the first few seconds. In other words, when we get lucky review plug in gets indexed, my feeling.
No warning in Google Search Engine, On Page Score 100 in the eyes of UberSuggest, got remark 7 pages with a poorly formatted URL for SEO, under info section, like cookie policy and alike.
Hello,
analyzing the page we did not detect anything out of place, however Google's indexing can sometimes be unpredictable and as you mentioned JS content requires a longer process.
I have reported the situation as an example so that we can consider an optimized implementation of this object in the future, in order to mitigate these issues.
Eric