Hello Estefania:

I would dare to say that it is a problem with lazy loading of the image files.

If you activated this option in the objects that allow it, try deactivating it, and then perform another diagnosis in "Google Page Speed ​​​​Insights test".

Greetings.

website's link ?

However, in 90 per cent of cases it is a harmless warning, not real error.
Certain ‘claims’ that Google or the various SEO pseudo-test tools have border on the ridiculous as claims.
They are just ‘hooey’ and I almost always ignore them.
If the programme generates the code in a certain way, and it is already optimised, you CANNOT do anything about it.
Try to optimise the rest (images, content, user interface, site usability).

If you test other online sites, even those created with the ‘famous’ CMSs (Wordpress, Joomla, etc.), you will also see much worse situations... but this does not mean that they are poorly done or that they are not optimised for SEO.

I think Incomedia should take into account Google's guidelines regarding performance. Any future update to the Google search algorithm could take into account performance parameters (Core Web Vitals) for SEO ranking. Website x5 pro should be updated in this regard to not cause a major loss of ranking.

I'm afraid you didn't read what I wrote....

1) within certain limits, certain values are irrelevant

2) Incomedia already takes them into account by trying to optimise the generated code as best it can, but a lot depends on you who makes the site.
If you use non-optimised images or have irrelevant content, there is no point in having a very fast site.

3) If you lose positions, it is not necessarily because of that, it could be due to the content of your site, or some google update that penalises you for other reasons.

Post a link to your site so that we can really evaluate...

I didn't say that I lost ranking positions now, what I meant was that there are things about the program that Google doesn't like and that this could mean a risk of losing ranking in the future.
Assuming that everything that depends on me is optimized (I have very good rankings now), this is fixable

113.2 KiB 450 ms
…style/style.css?
25.5 KiB
150 ms
…res/jquery.js?
87.8 KiB
300 ms

This is from Incomedia's program, this is not mine. Please tell me how to fix it or configure it.

If it can't be configured from the program, then update the program and let me know.

That code is indispensable.
I'is, in my opinion, insignificant, 300kb ???
Come on...
Anyway, wait for STAFF...
Bye

For you it may be a scam / staff now, but in the future this issue will seriously harm websites and Incomedia itself. I am attaching a screenshot so you can see that I am not lying, the Google test detects that my website, fully optimized for SEO, does not meet the loading speed metric due to programming...

Yo no he dicho que sea una estafa sino que es una sugerencia inútil la de JS y ese CSS que has denunciado.
Claro que tienes problemas...
el software funciona bien, tu trabajas mal en alguna parte...
Aquí hay una prueba de uno de mis sitios

questo di un altro mio, molto più pesante come homepage

come vedi anche questo ha risultati discreti  , ma ripeto, sono risultati che non vogliono dire un gran chè...

ovvio che se hai un sito che per caricare una pagina impiega 30 secondi allora si che sarai penalizzata

---------

esta de otra mia, mucho mas pesada como pagina de inicio

como se puede ver, esto también tiene resultados discretos, pero repito, son resultados que no significan mucho...

Obviamente, si tienes un sitio que tarda 30 segundos en cargar una página, entonces sí, serás penalizado.

espere al STAFF de Incomedia, a partir de la semana que viene... 

Creo que valdría la pena analizar tu proyecto para ver los ajustes que has puesto que generan esos tiempos tan largos y sobre todo en el LCP y FCP

Ahora voy a desconectar... Adiós

Hello Estefania,
from what you have mentioned, I think it is unlikely that these files are the main reason for the failure of some of the metric checks, as the files are very small and seem to have an impact in the order of milliseconds.
Perhaps there is a way to have a breakdown of the metrics that have a longer time, so that you can check everything that is affecting this?
We will of course try to optimize this, but there are limits to the extent to which this is possible.

Eric

Hi Eric,

Thanks for your reply.

I'll send you the URL privately and you can check it yourself?